Last night, G-man and I saw the movie "Saving Mr. Banks" at our local beach theater. Nice to say they have installed a new, digital projection system for our increased viewing pleasure.
We loved the movie. I even cried a little - very touching. The movie had so much more to it, than we expected. It had a great cast and good acting, not the least of which was Emma Thompson, one of my favorites. We exited the movie holding hands, our hearts warmed sufficiently for a January night.
I carried the good feeling home and then I made my mistake. I looked up P.L. Travers on the Internet; she being the author of Mary Poppins and the subject of the movie.
Has this ever happened to you? You really admire and enjoy an author; painter, musician, or other artist, then you read up on them and find out things you don't want to know. Such was the case with P.L. Travers. She comes across as quite a character in the movie and even more so in her real life.
The mistake is to assume that the author is the same as his or her work, and that you will like them just as much. I won't go into what I read about this author. It's not that bad, and you may not care to know.
The point is that the artist is a human being with a full range of foibles and gold stars, AND he or she has the amazing talent to create something whose worth stands alone. Mary Poppins, the books and the Disney movie, are no less delightful because P.L. Travers is not, herself, Mary Poppins or Emma Thompson. Nor should we expect her to be.
Sometimes, I forget this. I think it happens even more often when we confuse actors with the roles they play. After all, Robert Young, was not a real doctor, even if he did play one on TV, but he sure sold a lot of life insurance or over-the-counter, whatever it was that he was endorsing. We believed him, despite his disclaimer, because we believed him to be Marcus Welby, and MW was a man to be trusted.
In some ways, this is a good phenomenon. It is part of our willing suspension of disbelief that allows us to enjoy entertainment of all sorts that we know, fundamentally, is not real.
And... when we read up on the real person, we find ourselves in the land of TMI. Oh, my goodness, I just don't need to know all that because it interferes with my thorough enjoyment of the picture.
I can say that I may not enjoy your politics or lifestyle, but I sure do enjoy your work, and that is good enough. I think art should be experienced through your own imagination. History is a separate subject. Watch the film; have fun; leave Wikipedia alone.
We loved the movie. I even cried a little - very touching. The movie had so much more to it, than we expected. It had a great cast and good acting, not the least of which was Emma Thompson, one of my favorites. We exited the movie holding hands, our hearts warmed sufficiently for a January night.
I carried the good feeling home and then I made my mistake. I looked up P.L. Travers on the Internet; she being the author of Mary Poppins and the subject of the movie.
Has this ever happened to you? You really admire and enjoy an author; painter, musician, or other artist, then you read up on them and find out things you don't want to know. Such was the case with P.L. Travers. She comes across as quite a character in the movie and even more so in her real life.
The mistake is to assume that the author is the same as his or her work, and that you will like them just as much. I won't go into what I read about this author. It's not that bad, and you may not care to know.
The point is that the artist is a human being with a full range of foibles and gold stars, AND he or she has the amazing talent to create something whose worth stands alone. Mary Poppins, the books and the Disney movie, are no less delightful because P.L. Travers is not, herself, Mary Poppins or Emma Thompson. Nor should we expect her to be.
Sometimes, I forget this. I think it happens even more often when we confuse actors with the roles they play. After all, Robert Young, was not a real doctor, even if he did play one on TV, but he sure sold a lot of life insurance or over-the-counter, whatever it was that he was endorsing. We believed him, despite his disclaimer, because we believed him to be Marcus Welby, and MW was a man to be trusted.
In some ways, this is a good phenomenon. It is part of our willing suspension of disbelief that allows us to enjoy entertainment of all sorts that we know, fundamentally, is not real.
And... when we read up on the real person, we find ourselves in the land of TMI. Oh, my goodness, I just don't need to know all that because it interferes with my thorough enjoyment of the picture.
I can say that I may not enjoy your politics or lifestyle, but I sure do enjoy your work, and that is good enough. I think art should be experienced through your own imagination. History is a separate subject. Watch the film; have fun; leave Wikipedia alone.

